Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13951 - 13960 of 68564 for j o e y.
Search results 13951 - 13960 of 68564 for j o e y.
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. City of Milwaukee
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Michael J. McCabe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5853 - 2005-03-31
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Michael J. McCabe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Order of Court Denying Motion for Relief
; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that motion for relief from judgment is denied. JANET C. PROTASIEWICZ, J., did
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21ap1450_0301orderdenymotion.pdf - 2024-03-01
; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that motion for relief from judgment is denied. JANET C. PROTASIEWICZ, J., did
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21ap1450_0301orderdenymotion.pdf - 2024-03-01
[PDF]
August 2013 Published Orders
2012AP001863 CR State v. Charles E. Butts 2012AP002041 Timothy J. Botdorf v. Samuel R. Krebsbach 2012AP002131
/sc/pub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101505 - 2014-09-15
2012AP001863 CR State v. Charles E. Butts 2012AP002041 Timothy J. Botdorf v. Samuel R. Krebsbach 2012AP002131
/sc/pub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101505 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
August 2013 Published Orders
2012AP001863 CR State v. Charles E. Butts 2012AP002041 Timothy J. Botdorf v. Samuel R. Krebsbach 2012AP002131
/ca/pub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101507 - 2014-09-15
2012AP001863 CR State v. Charles E. Butts 2012AP002041 Timothy J. Botdorf v. Samuel R. Krebsbach 2012AP002131
/ca/pub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101507 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
grants Congress the power “[t]o regulate Commerce … among the several States.” U.S. CONST. art. I, § 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853209 - 2024-09-24
grants Congress the power “[t]o regulate Commerce … among the several States.” U.S. CONST. art. I, § 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853209 - 2024-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was irrational and capricious because “[e]vidence that a witness has lied once in the past is not proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377519 - 2021-06-15
was irrational and capricious because “[e]vidence that a witness has lied once in the past is not proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377519 - 2021-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Theodore Oswald
JUDGES: Brown, P.J., Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. Concurred: Nettesheim, J. Dissented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12331 - 2017-09-21
JUDGES: Brown, P.J., Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. Concurred: Nettesheim, J. Dissented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12331 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Amanda Carney-Hayes v. Northwest Wisconsin Home Care, Inc.
, Sarah E. Coyne, Emily M. Feinstein, O. Thomas Armstrong and Quarles & Brady LLP, Madison, and oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18981 - 2017-09-21
, Sarah E. Coyne, Emily M. Feinstein, O. Thomas Armstrong and Quarles & Brady LLP, Madison, and oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18981 - 2017-09-21
Amanda Carney-Hayes v. Northwest Wisconsin Home Care, Inc.
there was a brief by Donald K. Schott, Sarah E. Coyne, Emily M. Feinstein, O. Thomas Armstrong and Quarles & Brady
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18981 - 2005-07-11
there was a brief by Donald K. Schott, Sarah E. Coyne, Emily M. Feinstein, O. Thomas Armstrong and Quarles & Brady
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18981 - 2005-07-11
[PDF]
WI 129
the petition, and Justice Patience D. Roggensack, Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler, and Justice Michael J
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56727 - 2014-09-15
the petition, and Justice Patience D. Roggensack, Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler, and Justice Michael J
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56727 - 2014-09-15