Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
State v. Andrew S. Miller
is reviewed de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5097 - 2005-03-31
is reviewed de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5097 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andres Godina
). Whether a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21
). Whether a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fact that we review de novo without deference to the [circuit] court.” State v. McBride, 187 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152708 - 2017-09-21
fact that we review de novo without deference to the [circuit] court.” State v. McBride, 187 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152708 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Standard of Review ¶5 We review the circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139741 - 2017-09-21
Standard of Review ¶5 We review the circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139741 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, based on the undisputed facts or the facts as found by the circuit court, is an issue we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59341 - 2014-09-15
, based on the undisputed facts or the facts as found by the circuit court, is an issue we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59341 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review Lopez’s sentencing credit claim de novo. State v. Kitt, 2015 WI App 9, ¶3, 359 Wis. 2d 592, 859
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023100 - 2025-10-14
review Lopez’s sentencing credit claim de novo. State v. Kitt, 2015 WI App 9, ¶3, 359 Wis. 2d 592, 859
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023100 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a claim is procedurally barred “is a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Tillman, 2005
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072196 - 2026-02-04
a claim is procedurally barred “is a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Tillman, 2005
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072196 - 2026-02-04
David J. Gehl v. Peter Conrad
, when the exercise of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26120 - 2006-08-09
, when the exercise of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26120 - 2006-08-09