Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 30094 for de.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 30094 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342440 - 2021-03-04
from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342440 - 2021-03-04
[PDF]
State v. Maurice Clark
, are questions of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Jankowski, 173 Wis.2d 522, 525, 496 N.W.2d 215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12328 - 2014-09-15
, are questions of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Jankowski, 173 Wis.2d 522, 525, 496 N.W.2d 215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12328 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Frank A. H.
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. No. 02-0762-CR 6 ¶11 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5061 - 2017-09-19
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. No. 02-0762-CR 6 ¶11 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5061 - 2017-09-19
Debra J. Wall v. Michael K. Wall
which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
State v. William E. Hall
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
Kujawa Enterprises, Inc. v. Michael
. Conclusions of law will be reviewed de novo. See Tourtillott v. Ormson Corp., 190 Wis.2d 291, 295, 526 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12338 - 2005-03-31
. Conclusions of law will be reviewed de novo. See Tourtillott v. Ormson Corp., 190 Wis.2d 291, 295, 526 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12338 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Ashland v. John J. Jaakkola
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 No. 95-1359 -4- N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9065 - 2017-09-19
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 No. 95-1359 -4- N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9065 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Joseph S. Makhlouf v. Michael J. Kern
5 II. ANALYSIS. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11159 - 2017-09-19
5 II. ANALYSIS. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11159 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90901 - 2014-09-15
de novo. State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90901 - 2014-09-15