Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 16117 for probate.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 16117 for probate.
[PDF]
WI APP 31
: (4)(a) Any interested party may petition the court assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163419 - 2017-09-21
: (4)(a) Any interested party may petition the court assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163419 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Stat. § 980.01(6)(a). Smith’s probation and parole agent, Jennifer Priekschat, testified that Smith
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107048 - 2014-01-16
. Stat. § 980.01(6)(a). Smith’s probation and parole agent, Jennifer Priekschat, testified that Smith
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107048 - 2014-01-16
[PDF]
WI APP 37
. The trial court withheld sentence and imposed three years’ probation with costs, thirty days’ jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35485 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court withheld sentence and imposed three years’ probation with costs, thirty days’ jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35485 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Susan Holzl
Holzl to thirty days in jail with Huber privileges, imposed and stayed, placed her on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13333 - 2017-09-21
Holzl to thirty days in jail with Huber privileges, imposed and stayed, placed her on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13333 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Gaulrapp
entered no contest pleas to the two charges and was placed on probation. On review of a denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10688 - 2017-09-20
entered no contest pleas to the two charges and was placed on probation. On review of a denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10688 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for her actions. The trial court said that imposing probation would “unduly depreciate[] how serious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113299 - 2017-09-21
for her actions. The trial court said that imposing probation would “unduly depreciate[] how serious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113299 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and reading a positive letter from one of Prather’s teachers. It considered and rejected probation because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31303 - 2014-09-15
and reading a positive letter from one of Prather’s teachers. It considered and rejected probation because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31303 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the applicable statute now provides: “If a court imposes a sentence or places a person on probation, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159262 - 2017-09-21
, the applicable statute now provides: “If a court imposes a sentence or places a person on probation, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rejected probation as a disposition, concluding that it would unduly depreciate the offense’s aggravated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138270 - 2017-09-21
rejected probation as a disposition, concluding that it would unduly depreciate the offense’s aggravated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. The court determined that a sentence of probation would unduly depreciate the seriousness of the offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92057 - 2014-09-15
. The court determined that a sentence of probation would unduly depreciate the seriousness of the offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92057 - 2014-09-15