Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 15414 for probate.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 15414 for probate.
COURT OF APPEALS
suggested that Richmond would get probation for the crimes and that Groce “wore him down” by telling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104307 - 2013-11-18
suggested that Richmond would get probation for the crimes and that Groce “wore him down” by telling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104307 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
WI APP 84
. The treatment director shall promptly file the statement with the court having probate jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36553 - 2014-09-15
. The treatment director shall promptly file the statement with the court having probate jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36553 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William W. Boyd
. In addition to this forfeiture, the court ordered a sentence of three years of probation and a fine of $5000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16083 - 2017-09-21
. In addition to this forfeiture, the court ordered a sentence of three years of probation and a fine of $5000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16083 - 2017-09-21
Bert L. Warnecke, Sr. v. Bert L. Warnecke II
the Managed Forest Lands Program.” By the time Warnecke petitioned the probate court for the return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24663 - 2006-04-25
the Managed Forest Lands Program.” By the time Warnecke petitioned the probate court for the return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24663 - 2006-04-25
[PDF]
WI 21
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Sostarich was sentenced in federal court to three years probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32236 - 2014-09-15
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Sostarich was sentenced in federal court to three years probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32236 - 2014-09-15
James Turner. v. David H. Schwarz
“[T]he review process for both probation and parole revocation is identical.” State ex rel. Macemon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13897 - 2005-03-31
“[T]he review process for both probation and parole revocation is identical.” State ex rel. Macemon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13897 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
Services dating from 1991 arising from neglect. After Tammy was jailed on a probation hold in October 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3592 - 2005-03-31
Services dating from 1991 arising from neglect. After Tammy was jailed on a probation hold in October 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
We observe that I.S. was on probation for a 2013 criminal conviction when C.C.S. was born
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186885 - 2017-09-21
We observe that I.S. was on probation for a 2013 criminal conviction when C.C.S. was born
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186885 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a visit from a person from the probation department to interview him for sentencing purposes. No one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
a visit from a person from the probation department to interview him for sentencing purposes. No one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
excluded probation as a sentencing option. Turning to Gallion, the court considered Lara Saldivar’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174614 - 2017-09-21
excluded probation as a sentencing option. Turning to Gallion, the court considered Lara Saldivar’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174614 - 2017-09-21