Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 17264 for probate/1000.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 17264 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Jacques Gibson
that his prior drug offense “should have been offset by the fact that Coleman was on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14451 - 2017-09-21
that his prior drug offense “should have been offset by the fact that Coleman was on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14451 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
failure on probation, and a pending case involving another victim in Illinois, “there needs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
failure on probation, and a pending case involving another victim in Illinois, “there needs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to ten years of initial confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision, as well as probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231811 - 2019-01-09
to ten years of initial confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision, as well as probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231811 - 2019-01-09
State v. Arthur C. List
or not the penalty is rebated, suspended, or probated, in this state or any other jurisdiction. Wis. Stat. § 340.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7072 - 2005-03-31
or not the penalty is rebated, suspended, or probated, in this state or any other jurisdiction. Wis. Stat. § 340.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7072 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the prosecution to contact Howland’s probation and parole agent to complain about the PSI report recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58236 - 2010-12-28
for the prosecution to contact Howland’s probation and parole agent to complain about the PSI report recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58236 - 2010-12-28
State v. Douglas Royster
no circumstances should [Royster] be a candidate ... for any type of probation or [Division of Intensive Sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
no circumstances should [Royster] be a candidate ... for any type of probation or [Division of Intensive Sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the prosecution agreed to recommend probation as long as Boelter did not commit any new offenses while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103520 - 2017-09-21
, the prosecution agreed to recommend probation as long as Boelter did not commit any new offenses while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103520 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31