Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 47102 for shows.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 47102 for shows.
COURT OF APPEALS
not victims of the offenses in this case and that the record does not show that he has ever been physically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48904 - 2010-04-12
not victims of the offenses in this case and that the record does not show that he has ever been physically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48904 - 2010-04-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with a “presumption that the [circuit] court acted reasonably” and it is the defendant’s burden to show “some
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206308 - 2017-12-26
with a “presumption that the [circuit] court acted reasonably” and it is the defendant’s burden to show “some
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206308 - 2017-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We concluded the other acts evidence was relevant to show motive and context, among other things
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106336 - 2017-09-21
. We concluded the other acts evidence was relevant to show motive and context, among other things
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106336 - 2017-09-21
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
.” The court concluded that Elizondo had failed “to show that the withdrawal of [his] pleas are necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
.” The court concluded that Elizondo had failed “to show that the withdrawal of [his] pleas are necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to an evidentiary hearing on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea when: (1) the defendant makes a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86900 - 2012-09-11
to an evidentiary hearing on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea when: (1) the defendant makes a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86900 - 2012-09-11
State v. Jason R. Glascock
elements. ¶6 Glascock argues that the evidence was insufficient to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6581 - 2005-03-31
elements. ¶6 Glascock argues that the evidence was insufficient to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged in the criminal complaint “show that [Grant’s] actions fall into two distinct shooting episodes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91546 - 2014-09-15
alleged in the criminal complaint “show that [Grant’s] actions fall into two distinct shooting episodes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91546 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment. Id. A Fourth Amendment seizure has occurred when an officer, “by means of force or show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49203 - 2010-04-27
Amendment. Id. A Fourth Amendment seizure has occurred when an officer, “by means of force or show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49203 - 2010-04-27
State v. Dorian B. Stock
he failed to object to the jury instruction. To show ineffectiveness of trial counsel, appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4844 - 2005-03-31
he failed to object to the jury instruction. To show ineffectiveness of trial counsel, appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4844 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that could have been raised therein absent a showing of a sufficient reason for the omission. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91964 - 2013-01-23
that could have been raised therein absent a showing of a sufficient reason for the omission. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91964 - 2013-01-23