Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.

07AP2440 State v. Caprice S.I.doc
. The undisputed facts of this case establish that a dangerous weapon, a padlock with a shoestring attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32273 - 2008-04-01

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, which asked the defendants to describe the cell search by two defendants on a certain date when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27429 - 2006-12-13

[PDF] NOTICE
that she did not go armed with a concealed and dangerous weapon. The undisputed facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32273 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
paraphernalia. Probation agents discovered the items during a search of Moegenburg’s apartment after he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886295 - 2024-12-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
paraphernalia. Probation agents discovered the items during a search of Moegenburg’s apartment after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886295 - 2024-12-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Constitution, “all searches and seizures [must] be objectively reasonable under the circumstances existing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15

State v. James R. Walz
or “show of authority.” Id. at 572-73. The trooper’s actions in this case were arguably less intrusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6715 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. We reject Faulkner’s double jeopardy argument. ¶9 In the alternative, Faulkner contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144469 - 2015-07-20

[PDF] David Ott v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
.2d 222 (1978). This court’s role is to search the record to locate credible evidence that supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
retrial after a successful appeal applies in this case. We reject Faulkner’s double jeopardy argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144469 - 2017-09-21