Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 73792 for we.
Search results 13961 - 13970 of 73792 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, an administrative decision to revoke his extended supervision. For the reasons that follow, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183376 - 2017-09-21
, an administrative decision to revoke his extended supervision. For the reasons that follow, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183376 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Harr v. Gary McCaughtry
. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 In June 1998, approximately 250 inmates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3952 - 2005-03-31
. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 In June 1998, approximately 250 inmates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3952 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his motion for sentence modification. We conclude at conference that this matter is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230814 - 2018-12-12
his motion for sentence modification. We conclude at conference that this matter is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230814 - 2018-12-12
Michael J. Morgan v. Ford Motor Company
and an allegedly inconsistent verdict. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14390 - 2005-03-31
and an allegedly inconsistent verdict. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14390 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John L. Griffin
, discussing the applicable law—which we also discuss in some detail below—and then, after pointing out how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11542 - 2017-09-19
, discussing the applicable law—which we also discuss in some detail below—and then, after pointing out how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11542 - 2017-09-19
State v. George T. Wolfer, Jr.
as it did, and we therefore affirm the judgment. The underlying facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9344 - 2005-03-31
as it did, and we therefore affirm the judgment. The underlying facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 the record, counsel’s report, and Wagner’s response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245223 - 2019-08-21
2 the record, counsel’s report, and Wagner’s response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245223 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
Debra Sue Farber v. Daniel Paul Farber
of the property’s value which Debra had submitted. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16008 - 2017-09-21
of the property’s value which Debra had submitted. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16008 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jeffrey W. Wiseman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
upheld the hearing officer’s decision. We affirm. The hearing officer’s disciplinary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11261 - 2017-09-19
upheld the hearing officer’s decision. We affirm. The hearing officer’s disciplinary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11261 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Frank J. Steffes
is still entitled to a hearing on whether he refused to submit to a test. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14807 - 2017-09-21
is still entitled to a hearing on whether he refused to submit to a test. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14807 - 2017-09-21