Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13971 - 13980 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13971 - 13980 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Id. To show prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349994 - 2021-03-31
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Id. To show prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349994 - 2021-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
…. No. 2007AP1191 5 DISCUSSION ¶7 Questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo. Stephenson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31109 - 2014-09-15
…. No. 2007AP1191 5 DISCUSSION ¶7 Questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo. Stephenson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31109 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
5 constitutes a new factor is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Franklin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41323 - 2014-09-15
5 constitutes a new factor is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Franklin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing factor is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶36. However, the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258606 - 2020-04-28
sentencing factor is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶36. However, the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258606 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, these issues are matters of law which we review de novo. See State v. Fernandez, 2009 WI 29, ¶20, 316 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267886 - 2020-07-08
, these issues are matters of law which we review de novo. See State v. Fernandez, 2009 WI 29, ¶20, 316 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267886 - 2020-07-08
[PDF]
WI APP 9
(Ct. App. 1999). We review de novo the circuit court’s summary judgment decision that State Farm did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156604 - 2017-09-21
(Ct. App. 1999). We review de novo the circuit court’s summary judgment decision that State Farm did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 63
. App. 1997). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often give agency decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32110 - 2014-09-15
. App. 1997). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often give agency decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32110 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Minnig
. § 346.61. 2 This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7466 - 2017-09-20
. § 346.61. 2 This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7466 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
interpretation, which we review de novo. Waukesha County v. Darlene R., 201 Wis. 2d 633, 639, 549 N.W.2d 489
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36121 - 2014-09-15
interpretation, which we review de novo. Waukesha County v. Darlene R., 201 Wis. 2d 633, 639, 549 N.W.2d 489
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36121 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Larry A. Coon
. App. 1995). We review a probable cause determination de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5103 - 2017-09-19
. App. 1995). We review a probable cause determination de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5103 - 2017-09-19