Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13971 - 13980 of 44408 for name change.

State v. Doris B.
. The statutory changes took effect on May 5, 1994. The amendments to § 48.415, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10273 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John J. Callanan v. Bradley Kimmel Properties, Inc.
and a change in the jury’s damages award because it was not based on the evidence. At the postverdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13616 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Narda Forman v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
on the administrative law judge's findings; (2) the Commission failed to articulate a reason for changing the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7741 - 2017-09-19

wi app 70 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1928 Complete Title of...
or to petition for changes herein, whether or not the subjects were known to the parties at the time of execution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95527 - 2013-04-15

[PDF] Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
the park due to a change in ownership. The following facts are not in dispute. Benkoski rents four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14242 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the landscape has changed between our previous hearing and this one. Such that, I’m ethically bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627473 - 2023-03-01

[PDF] WI APP 22
of the Subject Property remained $10,300,000.00. Because the 2011 assessment did not change from the 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106579 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 116
daughters. In March 2010, Donald executed a codicil to the 2007 Will changing the personal representative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86935 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Wade L. Huggins
the amendment did not meaningfully change the basis upon which Huggins assessed the extent of possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10550 - 2017-09-20

Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
him to remove his units from the park due to a change in ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14242 - 2005-03-31