Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13981 - 13990 of 58997 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 13981 - 13990 of 58997 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Karl D. Heppner
. Heppner appeals from a judgment of conviction of two counts of second-degree sexual assault. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13239 - 2005-03-31
. Heppner appeals from a judgment of conviction of two counts of second-degree sexual assault. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court determined Cheel’s breach of contract claim against Society was time barred and rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890648 - 2024-12-18
court determined Cheel’s breach of contract claim against Society was time barred and rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890648 - 2024-12-18
Robert C. McRoberts, Jr. v. Toni L. Kant
claims with prejudice based upon a settlement agreement between Robert McRoberts, Jr., and Toni Kant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24853 - 2006-04-17
claims with prejudice based upon a settlement agreement between Robert McRoberts, Jr., and Toni Kant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24853 - 2006-04-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with an expectancy based on a diminished inheritance. Consequently, the plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028936 - 2025-10-28
with an expectancy based on a diminished inheritance. Consequently, the plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028936 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for plea withdrawal and the motion for reconsideration that followed. Because Morris’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73344 - 2014-09-15
for plea withdrawal and the motion for reconsideration that followed. Because Morris’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73344 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Because Morris’s claims are procedurally barred, we affirm. Background ¶2 Morris was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73344 - 2011-11-07
. Because Morris’s claims are procedurally barred, we affirm. Background ¶2 Morris was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73344 - 2011-11-07
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
of the law. Further, Okoronta claimed this error was prejudicial “because it deprived the defense of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
of the law. Further, Okoronta claimed this error was prejudicial “because it deprived the defense of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
rejection of these claims compels our rejection of an interest of justice claim. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
rejection of these claims compels our rejection of an interest of justice claim. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
State v. Anou Lo
affirm. Specifically, Lo claims that defense counsel was ineffective because: (1) he failed to bring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11915 - 2005-03-31
affirm. Specifically, Lo claims that defense counsel was ineffective because: (1) he failed to bring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11915 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to an evidentiary hearing on any of his three plea withdrawal claims, and whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
to an evidentiary hearing on any of his three plea withdrawal claims, and whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16