Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13981 - 13990 of 73032 for we.
Search results 13981 - 13990 of 73032 for we.
COURT OF APPEALS
in the reports of two psychologists who testified on his behalf. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
in the reports of two psychologists who testified on his behalf. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
Teresa L. v. Sauk County
failed to follow our directions on remand. We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8100 - 2005-03-31
failed to follow our directions on remand. We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8100 - 2005-03-31
William James, Sr. v. Gary McCaughtry
proceeding. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 While imprisoned at Waupun Correctional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4702 - 2005-03-31
proceeding. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 While imprisoned at Waupun Correctional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4702 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Vines
to his prior convictions. Because we conclude that the record sufficiently establishes his admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9906 - 2017-09-19
to his prior convictions. Because we conclude that the record sufficiently establishes his admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9906 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174461 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
Arline A. Smith v. City of Oconto
as a matter of law, we affirm the summary judgment of dismissal. The record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9815 - 2005-03-31
as a matter of law, we affirm the summary judgment of dismissal. The record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9815 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing on the petition. We affirm. I. ¶2 In June of 2000, the circuit court found Parrish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82788 - 2012-05-21
an evidentiary hearing on the petition. We affirm. I. ¶2 In June of 2000, the circuit court found Parrish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82788 - 2012-05-21
City of Kiel v. Michael T. Roehrig
detention of him was illegal under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). We reject Roehrig’s argument. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12235 - 2005-03-31
detention of him was illegal under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). We reject Roehrig’s argument. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12235 - 2005-03-31
State v. Hiram Johnson
and the submission of the two counts to the jury. We agree with the trial court that Johnson has not shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31
and the submission of the two counts to the jury. We agree with the trial court that Johnson has not shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31