Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 141 - 150 of 30002 for de.
Search results 141 - 150 of 30002 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Patti. The circuit court did not err in determining that Smith did not timely request de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131639 - 2017-09-21
Patti. The circuit court did not err in determining that Smith did not timely request de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131639 - 2017-09-21
Karen M. Joyce v. Town of Tainter
affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15585 - 2005-03-31
affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15585 - 2005-03-31
Karen M. Joyce v. Town of Tainter
affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15095 - 2005-03-31
affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Karen M. Joyce v. Town of Tainter
decision. We affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15095 - 2017-09-21
decision. We affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Karen M. Joyce v. Town of Tainter
decision. We affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15585 - 2017-09-21
decision. We affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then appointed Attorney De La Rosa to represent Carroll. Attorney De La Rosa met with Carroll before the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416175 - 2021-08-26
then appointed Attorney De La Rosa to represent Carroll. Attorney De La Rosa met with Carroll before the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416175 - 2021-08-26
[PDF]
P
v . J os hu a M . W ad e 10 -0 8- 20 08 A ff ir m ed /r ev er se d/ re m an de d
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34821 - 2014-09-15
v . J os hu a M . W ad e 10 -0 8- 20 08 A ff ir m ed /r ev er se d/ re m an de d
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34821 - 2014-09-15
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Town of Caledonia
challenge a real estate property tax assessment by commencing a de novo action in the circuit court pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9751 - 2005-03-31
challenge a real estate property tax assessment by commencing a de novo action in the circuit court pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9751 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Caseload Summary
Disposed Transferred Out De-activated Adjust/Audit End Pending C as el oa d G ro up C ri m in al
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadcounty24.pdf - 2025-03-06
Disposed Transferred Out De-activated Adjust/Audit End Pending C as el oa d G ro up C ri m in al
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadcounty24.pdf - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
Clearance Rate Summary
Incoming Total Disposed Transferred Out De- activated Audit Total Outgoing End Pending Adjust C as el
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty24.pdf - 2025-03-06
Incoming Total Disposed Transferred Out De- activated Audit Total Outgoing End Pending Adjust C as el
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty24.pdf - 2025-03-06