Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 141 - 150 of 217 for dha.
Search results 141 - 150 of 217 for dha.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
may be handled by either the Department of Administration’s Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187300 - 2017-09-21
may be handled by either the Department of Administration’s Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187300 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Wisconsin Department of Administration (“DHA”), rather than by [the Department]. [The Department] derives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52568 - 2010-07-26
of the Wisconsin Department of Administration (“DHA”), rather than by [the Department]. [The Department] derives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52568 - 2010-07-26
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2018
and Appeals (DHA). DHA determined that evidence of whether human remains exist in the mounds is not material
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210764 - 2018-04-03
and Appeals (DHA). DHA determined that evidence of whether human remains exist in the mounds is not material
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210764 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts one new case
. [Justice Patience Drake Roggensack did not participate] 2023AP590-W Smith v. DHA [Supervisory Writ
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/ac070623.pdf - 2023-07-06
. [Justice Patience Drake Roggensack did not participate] 2023AP590-W Smith v. DHA [Supervisory Writ
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/ac070623.pdf - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
of Hearing & Appeals Whether DHA erred in finding that Wis. Stat. s. 84.30 and Wisconsin Administrative
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250004 - 2019-11-11
of Hearing & Appeals Whether DHA erred in finding that Wis. Stat. s. 84.30 and Wisconsin Administrative
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250004 - 2019-11-11
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
. 2017AP1823 Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC v. Division of Hearing & Appeals Whether DHA erred in finding
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250862 - 2019-11-27
. 2017AP1823 Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC v. Division of Hearing & Appeals Whether DHA erred in finding
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250862 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decision in case no. 2017AP1894-CR
. 2017AP1823 Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC v. Division of Hearing & Appeals Whether DHA erred in finding
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251121 - 2019-12-06
. 2017AP1823 Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC v. Division of Hearing & Appeals Whether DHA erred in finding
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251121 - 2019-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Brunilson submitted a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) dated March 25, 2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207623 - 2018-01-23
, Brunilson submitted a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) dated March 25, 2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207623 - 2018-01-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
was issued by the Division of Hearings and Appeals of the Wisconsin Department of Administration (“DHA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52568 - 2014-09-15
was issued by the Division of Hearings and Appeals of the Wisconsin Department of Administration (“DHA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52568 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Appeals (DHA). Ware argued that: (1) the ALJ erred by finding that the DOC had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
and Appeals (DHA). Ware argued that: (1) the ALJ erred by finding that the DOC had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23