Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1401 - 1410 of 30177 for de.

City of Fort Atkinson v. Ronald A. Lendabarker
, because § 814.14(4)[3] provided the party with the option of a de novo trial in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10501 - 2011-04-28

[MS WORD] CV-505: Publication Notice Harassment Injunction Hearing
material. CV-503, 09/14 Motion for De Novo Hearing on a Temporary Restraining Order or Injunction
/formdisplay/CV-505.doc?formNumber=CV-505&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-12-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional right to self-representation has been violated is a question of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862726 - 2025-02-24

[PDF] NOTICE
lacks subject matter jurisdiction or personal jurisdiction is a question of law subject to our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35658 - 2014-09-15

Telemark Development, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
the commission’s decision de novo and conclude that the sales are not taxable. In the alternative, should we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13194 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 24, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of ...
court lacks subject matter jurisdiction or personal jurisdiction is a question of law subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35658 - 2009-02-23

Ronald J. Howe v. Neenah Springs, Inc.
the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5385 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decision de novo; (2) his request for funding his master’s degree was reasonable and consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174583 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Elisabeth Hagenstein v. DHFS
that we review de novo. See Stein v. State Psychology Examining Bd., 2003 WI App 147, ¶16, 265 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24787 - 2017-09-21

Janet L. Fry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
,” or “de novo.” See Bammert v. LIRC, 2000 WI App 28, ¶4, 232 Wis. 2d 365, 606 N.W.2d 620. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2305 - 2005-03-31