Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1401 - 1410 of 9321 for jurors.
Search results 1401 - 1410 of 9321 for jurors.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jurors from the panel. The circuit court excused two prospective jurors because they violated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89015 - 2014-09-15
jurors from the panel. The circuit court excused two prospective jurors because they violated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89015 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David A.L.
to return the next day to testify. At least one juror was present in the hallway when these comments were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10242 - 2017-09-20
to return the next day to testify. At least one juror was present in the hallway when these comments were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10242 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
court excused three prospective jurors from the panel. The circuit court excused two prospective jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89015 - 2012-11-25
court excused three prospective jurors from the panel. The circuit court excused two prospective jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89015 - 2012-11-25
[PDF]
State v. Virgil L. Burks
.” The lawyer explained that he was concerned that the jurors’ sympathy would be heightened because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6183 - 2017-09-19
.” The lawyer explained that he was concerned that the jurors’ sympathy would be heightened because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 588 N.W.2d 1 (1999), a case addressing juror misconduct and juror bias. We conclude that it would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702298 - 2023-09-14
, 588 N.W.2d 1 (1999), a case addressing juror misconduct and juror bias. We conclude that it would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702298 - 2023-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
jurors “would likely want to know” what the bailiff “might have to say about the case.” ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27406 - 2006-12-11
jurors “would likely want to know” what the bailiff “might have to say about the case.” ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27406 - 2006-12-11
State v. Virgil L. Burks
that would potentially sway the jury.” The lawyer explained that he was concerned that the jurors’ sympathy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6183 - 2005-03-31
that would potentially sway the jury.” The lawyer explained that he was concerned that the jurors’ sympathy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6183 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A.L.
another witness complaining about having to return the next day to testify. At least one juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10242 - 2005-03-31
another witness complaining about having to return the next day to testify. At least one juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10242 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harlan Schwartz
. A golden rule argument is one that asks individual jurors to put themselves in another’s place and decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4846 - 2005-03-31
. A golden rule argument is one that asks individual jurors to put themselves in another’s place and decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
improperly influenced because jurors “would likely want to know” what the bailiff “might have to say about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27406 - 2014-09-15
improperly influenced because jurors “would likely want to know” what the bailiff “might have to say about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27406 - 2014-09-15