Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14001 - 14010 of 58285 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel and failure to try the real controversy; and (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31353 - 2008-01-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) (2019-20).2 Foster filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, alleging that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399842 - 2021-07-29

[PDF] NOTICE
with counsel; (6) the denial of his motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31353 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
dismissed or a new trial ordered on three bases: (1) the State’s expert lied about his credentials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28312 - 2007-03-05

[PDF] NOTICE
and the case dismissed or a new trial ordered on three bases: (1) the State’s expert lied about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28312 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his admission that grounds existed to terminate his parental rights and proceed to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36889 - 2009-06-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court. The first is dated February 10, 2015, granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170310 - 2017-09-21

State v. Derryle S. McDowell
as party to a crime, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5223 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Derryle S. McDowell
. 1 Judge Dennis P. Moroney presided over the jury trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5223 - 2017-09-19

State v. Evan Zimmerman
issues on appeal.[1] He argues: (1) The evidence was insufficient to convict him; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5901 - 2005-03-31