Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14001 - 14010 of 20943 for word.
Search results 14001 - 14010 of 20943 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
: (The quotations, often awkward, are exactly as they appear in the transcript, except for the words in brackets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3569 - 2017-09-19
: (The quotations, often awkward, are exactly as they appear in the transcript, except for the words in brackets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3569 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, however, his probationary term had ended—in other words, he was no longer serving the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
motion, however, his probationary term had ended—in other words, he was no longer serving the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, unambiguous inquiries from the deputy. In other words, under the applicable legal standards, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064813 - 2026-01-23
, unambiguous inquiries from the deputy. In other words, under the applicable legal standards, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064813 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudice.” State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶59, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. In other words, “we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176947 - 2017-09-21
prejudice.” State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶59, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. In other words, “we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176947 - 2017-09-21
Narda Forman v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
be taken in the court.” A general rule of statutory construction is that the word “may” is construed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7741 - 2005-03-31
be taken in the court.” A general rule of statutory construction is that the word “may” is construed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained because Petrie was blowing into the breathalyzer. If so—in other words, if Kramp had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968545 - 2025-06-11
obtained because Petrie was blowing into the breathalyzer. If so—in other words, if Kramp had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968545 - 2025-06-11
Robert Tomaszewski v. David Giera
to allow an aggrieved party to enforce the fence viewers’ determination in court. It noted the word “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
to allow an aggrieved party to enforce the fence viewers’ determination in court. It noted the word “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
at 436. Further, the last words the jury heard from the witness stand on this subject were Walker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28196 - 2007-02-20
at 436. Further, the last words the jury heard from the witness stand on this subject were Walker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28196 - 2007-02-20
Laurie Briggs v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
. Briggs’s substitution of the word “by” for “in” in the phrase “to be done in that court,” State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15448 - 2005-03-31
. Briggs’s substitution of the word “by” for “in” in the phrase “to be done in that court,” State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15448 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
wording of the harmless error test asks “whether it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81562 - 2012-04-25
wording of the harmless error test asks “whether it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81562 - 2012-04-25