Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14011 - 14020 of 30139 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14011 - 14020 of 30139 for consulta de causas.
State v. Antwon C.
of these statutes is a legal issue that we analyze de novo. J.R., 152 Wis.2d at 603, 449 N.W.2d at 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12015 - 2005-03-31
of these statutes is a legal issue that we analyze de novo. J.R., 152 Wis.2d at 603, 449 N.W.2d at 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12015 - 2005-03-31
Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
conclusions of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12014 - 2005-03-31
conclusions of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims are procedurally barred presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921004 - 2025-03-04
claims are procedurally barred presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921004 - 2025-03-04
State v. Jason S. Petri
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶9 Petri argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶9 Petri argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
N.W.2d 433. This presents a question of law, which a reviewing court reviews under the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27843 - 2007-01-22
N.W.2d 433. This presents a question of law, which a reviewing court reviews under the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27843 - 2007-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
Louise Sterlinske v. School District of Bruce
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis.2d 75, 79, 450 N.W.2d 249, 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11413 - 2005-03-31
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis.2d 75, 79, 450 N.W.2d 249, 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11413 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joshua Jenkins
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a reason sufficient to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186887 - 2017-09-21
a reason sufficient to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186887 - 2017-09-21