Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14031 - 14040 of 18714 for quote.

Woodward Communications, Inc. v. Shockley Communications Corporation
to Ewers v. Eisenzopf, 88 Wis. 2d 482, 487, 276 N.W.2d 802 (1979) (quoting U.C.C. Wis. Stat. § 402.313(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16315 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the conclusion that Bolstad was not in custody. See, e.g. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d at 214 (quoting factors identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122986 - 2014-10-01

Oneida County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
, 87 Wis. 2d 819, 827, 275 N.W.2d 723 (1979) (quoting Glendale Prof’l Policemen’s Ass’n v. Glendale, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2280 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
be based on a review of the evidence submitted. [4] LIRC quoted the following from Beecher v. LIRC, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that are not dispositive need not be addressed.” (quoted source omitted)).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946302 - 2025-04-23

Thomas W. Coates v. Margaret G. Coates
—we are satisfied that the second quoted sentence was a mistake, and that the court plainly intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13189 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
as to conclude the owner.” Cohn v. Town of Randall, 2001 WI App 176, ¶6, 247 Wis. 2d 118, 633 N.W.2d 674 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125491 - 2014-11-03

State v. Kevin Ryan
takes the above quoted assertions out of context in his attempt to apply them here to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14519 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient’ and ‘that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.’” See id. (quoting Strickland, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70478 - 2011-09-06

Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
to its employee against the wage loss damages it owed him. The court quoted the Seventh Circuit’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30