Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14031 - 14040 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 14031 - 14040 of 58509 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel and failure to try the real controversy; and (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31353 - 2008-01-02
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel and failure to try the real controversy; and (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31353 - 2008-01-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
with counsel; (6) the denial of his motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31353 - 2014-09-15
with counsel; (6) the denial of his motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and closing arguments. C.J.T. also contends that the trial court erred in admitting prejudicial hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151200 - 2017-09-21
and closing arguments. C.J.T. also contends that the trial court erred in admitting prejudicial hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151200 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dale M. Buegel v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
, M.D., appeals, pro se, from a final decision and order of the trial court affirming the final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6484 - 2017-09-19
, M.D., appeals, pro se, from a final decision and order of the trial court affirming the final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6484 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2019-20).2 Foster filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, alleging that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399842 - 2021-07-29
) (2019-20).2 Foster filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, alleging that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399842 - 2021-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court. The first is dated February 10, 2015, granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170310 - 2017-09-21
of the trial court. The first is dated February 10, 2015, granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170310 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his admission that grounds existed to terminate his parental rights and proceed to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36889 - 2009-06-18
to withdraw his admission that grounds existed to terminate his parental rights and proceed to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36889 - 2009-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
dismissed or a new trial ordered on three bases: (1) the State’s expert lied about his credentials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28312 - 2007-03-05
dismissed or a new trial ordered on three bases: (1) the State’s expert lied about his credentials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28312 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
and the case dismissed or a new trial ordered on three bases: (1) the State’s expert lied about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28312 - 2014-09-15
and the case dismissed or a new trial ordered on three bases: (1) the State’s expert lied about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28312 - 2014-09-15