Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14041 - 14050 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14041 - 14050 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
State v. William E. Hall
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Shullsburg v. Ronald L. Monahan
question of whether Strause had probable cause to arrest Monahan de novo. See State v. Babbit, 188 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13387 - 2017-09-21
question of whether Strause had probable cause to arrest Monahan de novo. See State v. Babbit, 188 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13387 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” which is No. 2023AP1405 5 reviewed de novo. DeBraska v. Quad Graphics, Inc., 2009 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798908 - 2024-05-09
,” which is No. 2023AP1405 5 reviewed de novo. DeBraska v. Quad Graphics, Inc., 2009 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798908 - 2024-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
Debra J. Wall v. Michael K. Wall
which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a seizure has occurred is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28648 - 2007-04-04
a seizure has occurred is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28648 - 2007-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The proper measure of damages applicable to a specific claim presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240597 - 2019-05-14
. The proper measure of damages applicable to a specific claim presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240597 - 2019-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The application of a statute to the facts of the case is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waller v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26
. “The application of a statute to the facts of the case is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waller v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
State v. Larry A. Coon
a probable cause determination de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5103 - 2005-03-31
a probable cause determination de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5103 - 2005-03-31