Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14041 - 14050 of 20931 for word.

COURT OF APPEALS
of Wis. Stat. § 940.225(2)(d). The word “intentionally” includes knowledge of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103670 - 2013-11-05

COURT OF APPEALS
. noted that the words “‘significant’ and ‘daily’” in the statute “do not indicate that the assumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98077 - 2005-03-31

State v. Derrick Benton
approached Franklin, who was sitting in the front passenger seat, exchanged words with Franklin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2527 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
filed the reconsideration motion believing that his use of the words “grievous, reckless and malicious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78011 - 2012-02-13

State v. Michael S. Kreutz
warnings, whether or not they apply to the particular suspect, and to do so in the very words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8595 - 2005-06-07

COURT OF APPEALS
be “sufficiently serious,” in other words “the inmate must show that he is incarcerated under conditions posing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34930 - 2008-12-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that choice of words matters, given the court’s subsequent treatment of the payments as income. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177515 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Edrick P. Robinson
be extrapolated from Demars based on the use of the word “detainer.” The real issue would be the specific legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2827 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 86
. In other words, issue preclusion refers to the effect of a judgment in foreclosing relitigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32691 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
because Stephens directed his words to the detective as demonstrated by calling the detective a punk.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32501 - 2014-09-15