Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14061 - 14070 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14061 - 14070 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
State v. David R. Messner
99-2116-CR 3 a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15553 - 2017-09-21
99-2116-CR 3 a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15553 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. Here, Gilmore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68895 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. Here, Gilmore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68895 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81567 - 2014-09-15
4 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81567 - 2014-09-15
Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Brandon Harrell
We review a motion for summary judgment de novo. Envirologix Corp. v. City of Waukesha, 192 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12186 - 2005-03-31
We review a motion for summary judgment de novo. Envirologix Corp. v. City of Waukesha, 192 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12186 - 2005-03-31
State v. Heather C.P.
. This court will interpret the requirements of §§ 48.30 and 48.315, Stats., de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12049 - 2005-03-31
. This court will interpret the requirements of §§ 48.30 and 48.315, Stats., de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12049 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Sailing
any of the factual findings made by the trial court, we review de novo the question of law: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11936 - 2005-03-31
any of the factual findings made by the trial court, we review de novo the question of law: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11936 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34556 - 2008-11-11
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34556 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. ¶8 Here, Espitia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983226 - 2025-07-16
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. ¶8 Here, Espitia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983226 - 2025-07-16
John Smith v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14702 - 2005-03-31
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14702 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arthur B. Patton
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31