Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14061 - 14070 of 17244 for probate/1000.
Search results 14061 - 14070 of 17244 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and placed Harris on probation for four years. The court ordered that Harris serve five months
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152712 - 2017-09-21
, and placed Harris on probation for four years. The court ordered that Harris serve five months
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152712 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and stayed in the prior case on August 31, 2016, and that Thiry had been placed on probation for three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543063 - 2022-07-13
and stayed in the prior case on August 31, 2016, and that Thiry had been placed on probation for three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543063 - 2022-07-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
) recommended probation. Evanich was sentenced to two years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34268 - 2014-09-15
) recommended probation. Evanich was sentenced to two years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34268 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Jodi L. Meier Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Brian Sheffler Register in Probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913866 - 2025-02-12
. Jodi L. Meier Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Brian Sheffler Register in Probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913866 - 2025-02-12
State v. Douglas Royster
no circumstances should [Royster] be a candidate ... for any type of probation or [Division of Intensive Sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
no circumstances should [Royster] be a candidate ... for any type of probation or [Division of Intensive Sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the mitigating factors and led the court to conclude that probation, expungement, or CIP eligibility were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211871 - 2018-05-02
the mitigating factors and led the court to conclude that probation, expungement, or CIP eligibility were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211871 - 2018-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the prosecution agreed to recommend probation as long as Boelter did not commit any new offenses while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103520 - 2017-09-21
, the prosecution agreed to recommend probation as long as Boelter did not commit any new offenses while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103520 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
was imposed and stayed in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31