Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14071 - 14080 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
claims: (1) that his attorney at his revocation hearing was No. 97-2939 2 ineffective; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13111 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
and misrepresentation claims against James W. Parker and an order denying its motion for reconsideration. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106567 - 2014-01-14

2006 WI APP 260
personal injury claim had no value when the inventory was filed and thus the register in probate may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26674 - 2006-12-19

[PDF] NOTICE
for failing to bring his claims in his first postconviction motion, we conclude his claims are procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56196 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] John M. Minor v. David M. Jacek
Minor damages for that negligence. Jacek contends Minor’s negligence claim is barred by the election
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7358 - 2017-09-20

State v. Brian J. Dorsey
postconviction motion seeking to withdraw his plea. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not receive a fair trial. The circuit court concluded that his claims were procedurally barred. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357767 - 2021-04-20

Marvin A. Ness v. William Carothers
claim of title by a written instrument and payment of taxes, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 893.27.[3] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18264 - 2005-05-23

Armin Nankin v. Village of Shorewood
request that Wis. Stat. § 74.37(6) (1997-98)[1] be declared unconstitutional. Nankin claims the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15418 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
is entitled to judicial substitution and the new judge should determine whether claim or issue preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7643 - 2017-09-19