Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14071 - 14080 of 30081 for de.
Search results 14071 - 14080 of 30081 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41323 - 2009-09-28
fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41323 - 2009-09-28
State v. Eugene Keeler
de novo. Whether a prosecutor intended to provoke a mistrial in order to gain another chance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15118 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Whether a prosecutor intended to provoke a mistrial in order to gain another chance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15118 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101565 - 2013-09-03
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101565 - 2013-09-03
COURT OF APPEALS
is a matter of law that this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc., 210 Wis. 2d 524, 536
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28779 - 2007-04-23
is a matter of law that this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc., 210 Wis. 2d 524, 536
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28779 - 2007-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶33. Whether the elements are met is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107953 - 2014-02-17
.” Id., ¶33. Whether the elements are met is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107953 - 2014-02-17
[PDF]
Foresight, Inc v. Daniel Babl
nonconforming use is a question of law that we review de novo. Waukesha County v. Seitz, 140 Wis.2d 111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11086 - 2017-09-19
nonconforming use is a question of law that we review de novo. Waukesha County v. Seitz, 140 Wis.2d 111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11086 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Waites
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9966 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9966 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo “‘the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485725 - 2022-02-22
review de novo “‘the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485725 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
Tony Limbach and Tracy Limbach v. John Donath
the evidence at trial. We decline to depart from this rule to decide de novo whether the parties’ contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12834 - 2017-09-21
the evidence at trial. We decline to depart from this rule to decide de novo whether the parties’ contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12834 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
unlitigated[,]” and thus review should be de novo. We disagree. In Jicha, the court based great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27873 - 2014-09-15
unlitigated[,]” and thus review should be de novo. We disagree. In Jicha, the court based great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27873 - 2014-09-15