Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14081 - 14090 of 44385 for name change.
Search results 14081 - 14090 of 44385 for name change.
[PDF]
Mary Ellyn Doerr v. Charles A. Doerr
in child support. The amount changed to $725 per month when Edward reached his majority. On April 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10132 - 2017-09-19
in child support. The amount changed to $725 per month when Edward reached his majority. On April 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10132 - 2017-09-19
State v. Doris B.
. The statutory changes took effect on May 5, 1994. The amendments to § 48.415, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10274 - 2005-03-31
. The statutory changes took effect on May 5, 1994. The amendments to § 48.415, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10274 - 2005-03-31
State v. Doris B.
. The statutory changes took effect on May 5, 1994. The amendments to § 48.415, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10273 - 2005-03-31
. The statutory changes took effect on May 5, 1994. The amendments to § 48.415, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10273 - 2005-03-31
Everett Carlson v. Oconto County Board of Canvassers
changed the election results pursuant to Wis. Stat. chs. 5-12;[1] and (2) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2765 - 2005-03-31
changed the election results pursuant to Wis. Stat. chs. 5-12;[1] and (2) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2765 - 2005-03-31
Jon R. Woodard v. Pammy L. Woodard
in light of the substantial change in circumstances.”). In this case, Pam’s testimony showed that during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7142 - 2005-05-09
in light of the substantial change in circumstances.”). In this case, Pam’s testimony showed that during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7142 - 2005-05-09
State v. Michael J. Cauley
of Michael's change of plea. The court addressed the second question directly. It held that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9637 - 2005-03-31
of Michael's change of plea. The court addressed the second question directly. It held that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9637 - 2005-03-31
State v. Linda R. Cauley
of Michael's change of plea. The court addressed the second question directly. It held that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9590 - 2005-03-31
of Michael's change of plea. The court addressed the second question directly. It held that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 221
relief based on a change in the law that renders the judgment unjust. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29861 - 2014-09-15
relief based on a change in the law that renders the judgment unjust. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29861 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
the park due to a change in ownership. The following facts are not in dispute. Benkoski rents four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14242 - 2014-09-15
the park due to a change in ownership. The following facts are not in dispute. Benkoski rents four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14242 - 2014-09-15
State v. Wade L. Huggins
because the amendment did not meaningfully change the basis upon which Huggins assessed the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10550 - 2005-03-31
because the amendment did not meaningfully change the basis upon which Huggins assessed the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10550 - 2005-03-31