Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14081 - 14090 of 58486 for o j.
Search results 14081 - 14090 of 58486 for o j.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
biggest objection … is to the large number of hours of trial preparation time…. … [O]ne thing that I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28050 - 2007-02-07
biggest objection … is to the large number of hours of trial preparation time…. … [O]ne thing that I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28050 - 2007-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
?” [Shallcross] responds, “[n]o, no....” The officer then asks, “[i]s it okay to come and talk with you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
?” [Shallcross] responds, “[n]o, no....” The officer then asks, “[i]s it okay to come and talk with you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
just a partial defense, the Strickland test applies.”). The Cronic Court recognized that [o]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794700 - 2024-05-01
just a partial defense, the Strickland test applies.”). The Cronic Court recognized that [o]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794700 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
Amy Mathias v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.
), STATS., which permits that “[o]n motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10933 - 2017-09-20
), STATS., which permits that “[o]n motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10933 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶74 (quoted source omitted). “[N]o matter how good experts’ credentials may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854603 - 2024-09-26
., ¶74 (quoted source omitted). “[N]o matter how good experts’ credentials may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854603 - 2024-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
during the recount. Section 9.01(8)(c). Sherley contends that under this statutory provision, “[o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239987 - 2019-04-30
during the recount. Section 9.01(8)(c). Sherley contends that under this statutory provision, “[o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239987 - 2019-04-30
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5561 - 2005-03-31
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5561 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 150, 50 7 N.W.2d 94 (1993); Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97407 - 2014-09-15
, 150, 50 7 N.W.2d 94 (1993); Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97407 - 2014-09-15
Appeal No
-90 (“[O]nly the supreme court, the highest court in the state, has the power to overrule, modify
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58795 - 2011-01-10
-90 (“[O]nly the supreme court, the highest court in the state, has the power to overrule, modify
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58795 - 2011-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS
to us any more?” [Shallcross] responds, “[n]o, no....” The officer then asks, “[i]s it okay to come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88395 - 2012-10-22
to us any more?” [Shallcross] responds, “[n]o, no....” The officer then asks, “[i]s it okay to come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88395 - 2012-10-22