Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14091 - 14100 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14091 - 14100 of 30191 for de.
State v. Bernard A. James
. Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6697 - 2005-03-31
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6697 - 2005-03-31
Heath Buchholz v. Farmers Inc. of Allenton
presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de novo. Morgan, 87 Wis. 2d at 737. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21639 - 2006-03-07
presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de novo. Morgan, 87 Wis. 2d at 737. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21639 - 2006-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204073 - 2017-11-30
is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204073 - 2017-11-30
[PDF]
State v. Jerry L. Parker
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4479 - 2017-09-19
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4479 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶4 Sommer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134599 - 2015-02-09
a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶4 Sommer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134599 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
State v. Yathzee D. Inman
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10404 - 2017-09-20
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10404 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was constitutionally ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶14 Trial counsel explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72316 - 2014-09-15
was constitutionally ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶14 Trial counsel explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72316 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30231 - 2014-09-15
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30231 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nikola P. Kostich
, 974, 498 N.W.2d 380 (1993). The referee's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18713 - 2017-09-21
, 974, 498 N.W.2d 380 (1993). The referee's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18713 - 2017-09-21