Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14091 - 14100 of 73791 for we.
Search results 14091 - 14100 of 73791 for we.
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction for illegally possessing a prescription drug. We agree and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
conviction for illegally possessing a prescription drug. We agree and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the interest of justice. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. ¶2 Higgenbottom was convicted following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367402 - 2021-05-19
in the interest of justice. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. ¶2 Higgenbottom was convicted following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367402 - 2021-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on a new factor. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On February 28, 2020
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769890 - 2024-03-05
on a new factor. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On February 28, 2020
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769890 - 2024-03-05
State v. Juan Mata
,” this constituted prejudicial error and he should be granted a new trial. We agree that the error was prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12854 - 2005-03-31
,” this constituted prejudicial error and he should be granted a new trial. We agree that the error was prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12854 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the arrest. We reverse the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 At 2:21 a.m. on April 22, 2007, Village of Bonduel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35890 - 2009-03-16
for the arrest. We reverse the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 At 2:21 a.m. on April 22, 2007, Village of Bonduel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35890 - 2009-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 However, based on the record that is before us, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶3 Chambers filed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297552 - 2020-10-20
. ¶2 However, based on the record that is before us, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶3 Chambers filed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297552 - 2020-10-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
in which the victims had obtained civil judgments. We affirm. ¶2 Ward first argues that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29986 - 2014-09-15
in which the victims had obtained civil judgments. We affirm. ¶2 Ward first argues that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29986 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220417 - 2018-10-02
sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220417 - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98122 - 2014-09-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98122 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to Armbrust. Under the facts of this case, we conclude Armbrust was blameless and default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32778 - 2014-09-15
to Armbrust. Under the facts of this case, we conclude Armbrust was blameless and default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32778 - 2014-09-15