Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1411 - 1420 of 65010 for divorce records.
Search results 1411 - 1420 of 65010 for divorce records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. There are two signed judgments of divorce in the record. One is dated May 14, 2020, and one is dated May 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550909 - 2022-08-03
. There are two signed judgments of divorce in the record. One is dated May 14, 2020, and one is dated May 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550909 - 2022-08-03
COURT OF APPEALS
started when Dr. Ackerman, as a court-appointed psychologist in Dr. Hatfield’s 1993 divorce action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
started when Dr. Ackerman, as a court-appointed psychologist in Dr. Hatfield’s 1993 divorce action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
-appointed psychologist in Dr. Hatfield’s 1993 divorce action and custody dispute, opined that Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32834 - 2014-09-15
-appointed psychologist in Dr. Hatfield’s 1993 divorce action and custody dispute, opined that Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32834 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
legal custody on the issue of school choice for C.H. Based on our review of the briefs and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173804 - 2017-09-21
legal custody on the issue of school choice for C.H. Based on our review of the briefs and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173804 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 Ann and Robert were married in 1982 and divorced in 2005. At the time of the divorce, two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174522 - 2017-09-21
. ¶2 Ann and Robert were married in 1982 and divorced in 2005. At the time of the divorce, two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174522 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Laurie Ruth Rosin v. Lee Alan Scholtus
to modify the divorce judgment, but only sought an interpretation or clarification of "reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11588 - 2017-09-19
to modify the divorce judgment, but only sought an interpretation or clarification of "reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11588 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
under a 1987 divorce judgment. He argues that the circuit court ignored the parties' agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9911 - 2017-09-19
under a 1987 divorce judgment. He argues that the circuit court ignored the parties' agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9911 - 2017-09-19
Laurie Ruth Rosin v. Lee Alan Scholtus
motion did not seek to modify the divorce judgment, but only sought an interpretation or clarification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11588 - 2005-03-31
motion did not seek to modify the divorce judgment, but only sought an interpretation or clarification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11588 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
to Elizabeth H. Taylor under a 1987 divorce judgment. He argues that the circuit court ignored the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
to Elizabeth H. Taylor under a 1987 divorce judgment. He argues that the circuit court ignored the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark Smith appeals his divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29704 - 2005-03-31
Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark Smith appeals his divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29704 - 2005-03-31