Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14101 - 14110 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
before in this case.[1] The motion that Dean filed on September 30, 2009, specifically relied on Cherry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121253 - 2014-09-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the investigation. He was ultimately taken into custody and searched at the Racine County Jail, where corrections
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the investigation. He was ultimately taken into custody and searched at the Racine County Jail, where corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
change. Based upon our review of his brief and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237565 - 2019-03-20

State v. Marvin Jost
that a second trial be held. ΒΆ3 Jost subsequently moved the court to dismiss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6487 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jerry P. Dowdley
to her car she was confronted by Christopher Bush, the co-defendant in this case. Bush forced his way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8015 - 2005-03-31

State v. Arnulfo Torres
Jacoby on July 3, 1994. Based on information provided by a confidential informant, the police searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8299 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard A. Edwards
unreasonable searches and seizures when he or she obtains a blood sample from an OMVWI arrestee, even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
conviction, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26847 - 2006-10-18

[PDF] NOTICE
, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26847 - 2014-09-15