Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14111 - 14120 of 29991 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14111 - 14120 of 29991 for consulta de causas.
State v. Marcus M.
reasonable is one we review de novo. See id. Using these standards, we review first the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15694 - 2005-03-31
reasonable is one we review de novo. See id. Using these standards, we review first the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15694 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review is de novo. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274, ¶34, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 654 N.W.2d 24. ¶5 I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43027 - 2009-11-04
review is de novo. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274, ¶34, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 654 N.W.2d 24. ¶5 I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43027 - 2009-11-04
Cory W. Hussey v. Outagamie County
summary judgment de novo. Park Bankcorp. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513 N.W.2d 609, 613 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9877 - 2005-03-31
summary judgment de novo. Park Bankcorp. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513 N.W.2d 609, 613 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9877 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the procedural bar is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
the procedural bar is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneous. State v. Young, 2006 WI 98, ¶17, 294 Wis. 2d 1, 717 N.W.2d 729. We review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721268 - 2023-10-31
erroneous. State v. Young, 2006 WI 98, ¶17, 294 Wis. 2d 1, 717 N.W.2d 729. We review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721268 - 2023-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶4 Sommer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134599 - 2015-02-09
a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶4 Sommer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134599 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of establishing a prima facie case [is] a question of law that we [decide] de novo.” Id., ¶10. ¶9 To make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101959 - 2017-09-21
of establishing a prima facie case [is] a question of law that we [decide] de novo.” Id., ¶10. ¶9 To make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101959 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James Munroe v. Dykstra
). This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11628 - 2017-09-19
). This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11628 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to the facts, which involves a question of law we review de novo. See Klessig, 211 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105971 - 2013-12-26
of constitutional principles to the facts, which involves a question of law we review de novo. See Klessig, 211 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105971 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
WI APP 81
concentration.” WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b). No. 2009AP1990-CR 3 review de novo, see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50273 - 2014-09-15
concentration.” WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b). No. 2009AP1990-CR 3 review de novo, see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50273 - 2014-09-15