Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14111 - 14120 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14111 - 14120 of 30191 for de.
Michael D. Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
that we review de novo. Jacobs v. Karls, 178 Wis.2d 268, 273, 504 N.W.2d 353, 355 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Jacobs v. Karls, 178 Wis.2d 268, 273, 504 N.W.2d 353, 355 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
[PDF]
Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
State v. City of Rhinelander
the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5611 - 2005-03-31
the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5611 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
Dana J. Mignognia v. Salvatore Mignognia
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51566 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51566 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Larry A. Coon
. App. 1995). We review a probable cause determination de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5103 - 2017-09-19
. App. 1995). We review a probable cause determination de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5103 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Janice M. Eilola v. Linda Hattlestad
. Whether the facts satisfy a legal standard presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15254 - 2017-09-21
. Whether the facts satisfy a legal standard presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
3 Reinl argues the standard of review is de novo, but she misunderstands the proper standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40272 - 2014-09-15
3 Reinl argues the standard of review is de novo, but she misunderstands the proper standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40272 - 2014-09-15