Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14111 - 14120 of 58502 for o j.
Search results 14111 - 14120 of 58502 for o j.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶74 (quoted source omitted). “[N]o matter how good experts’ credentials may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854603 - 2024-09-26
., ¶74 (quoted source omitted). “[N]o matter how good experts’ credentials may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854603 - 2024-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 766 N.W.2d 206 (“[O]ur inquiry is whether discretion was exercised, not whether it could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213100 - 2018-08-31
, 766 N.W.2d 206 (“[O]ur inquiry is whether discretion was exercised, not whether it could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213100 - 2018-08-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the outcome of the plea process.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). “[T]o satisfy the ‘prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345626 - 2021-03-16
the outcome of the plea process.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). “[T]o satisfy the ‘prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345626 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the suppression ruling. See WIS. STAT. § 974.05(1)(d)2. (“appeal may be taken by the state from any[] … [o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564669 - 2022-09-09
of the suppression ruling. See WIS. STAT. § 974.05(1)(d)2. (“appeal may be taken by the state from any[] … [o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564669 - 2022-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to us any more?” [Shallcross] responds, “[n]o, no....” The officer then asks, “[i]s it okay to come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88395 - 2012-10-22
to us any more?” [Shallcross] responds, “[n]o, no....” The officer then asks, “[i]s it okay to come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88395 - 2012-10-22
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5563 - 2005-03-31
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5563 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5558 - 2005-03-31
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5558 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Ovadal
are substantial. It went on to say that "[o]f course, it is difficult to imagine that the City would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15840 - 2017-09-21
are substantial. It went on to say that "[o]f course, it is difficult to imagine that the City would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15840 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] left until the case was over with.” King said he responded: “[N]o, you can put your money back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
] left until the case was over with.” King said he responded: “[N]o, you can put your money back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 150, 50 7 N.W.2d 94 (1993); Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97407 - 2014-09-15
, 150, 50 7 N.W.2d 94 (1993); Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97407 - 2014-09-15

