Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14121 - 14130 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 14121 - 14130 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Anou Lo
affirm. Specifically, Lo claims that defense counsel was ineffective because: (1) he failed to bring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11915 - 2005-03-31
affirm. Specifically, Lo claims that defense counsel was ineffective because: (1) he failed to bring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11915 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to an evidentiary hearing on any of his three plea withdrawal claims, and whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
to an evidentiary hearing on any of his three plea withdrawal claims, and whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
of the law. Further, Okoronta claimed this error was prejudicial “because it deprived the defense of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
of the law. Further, Okoronta claimed this error was prejudicial “because it deprived the defense of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for plea withdrawal and the motion for reconsideration that followed. Because Morris’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73344 - 2014-09-15
for plea withdrawal and the motion for reconsideration that followed. Because Morris’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 22
defendants to consolidate their postconviction claims into a single appeal absent a “sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59033 - 2014-09-15
defendants to consolidate their postconviction claims into a single appeal absent a “sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59033 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
of the law. Further, Okoronta claimed this error was prejudicial “because it deprived the defense of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3101 - 2017-09-20
of the law. Further, Okoronta claimed this error was prejudicial “because it deprived the defense of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3101 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. After reviewing the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103111 - 2017-09-21
the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. After reviewing the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
S. MANAK, DEFENDANTS-CROSS-CLAIM DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215157 - 2018-07-03
S. MANAK, DEFENDANTS-CROSS-CLAIM DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215157 - 2018-07-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with an expectancy based on a diminished inheritance. Consequently, the plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028936 - 2025-10-28
with an expectancy based on a diminished inheritance. Consequently, the plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028936 - 2025-10-28
COURT OF APPEALS
who claimed that William Haessly or Thaddeus Rudnicki had made statements about the crime to them over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34770 - 2008-12-03
who claimed that William Haessly or Thaddeus Rudnicki had made statements about the crime to them over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34770 - 2008-12-03