Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14121 - 14130 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14121 - 14130 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. ¶8 Here, Espitia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983226 - 2025-07-16
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. ¶8 Here, Espitia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983226 - 2025-07-16
John Smith v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14702 - 2005-03-31
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14702 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arthur B. Patton
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
City of Wautoma v. Richard A. Wehe
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15050 - 2005-03-31
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15050 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law for our de novo review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33067 - 2008-06-17
) and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law for our de novo review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33067 - 2008-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 961.41(1x) is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Smith, 189 Wis. 2d 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137813 - 2017-09-21
. § 961.41(1x) is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Smith, 189 Wis. 2d 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137813 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
The North Bay Co. v. Washburn County Zoning Committee
leaving only a question of law, which we decide de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10052 - 2017-09-19
leaving only a question of law, which we decide de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10052 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Peter J. Mehler v. The State of Wisconsin Examing Board of Social Workers
the standard of review. Mehler maintains that our review should be de novo because this is a new statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10072 - 2017-09-19
the standard of review. Mehler maintains that our review should be de novo because this is a new statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10072 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Washington County v. Carl J. Wagner
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Chernetski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26373 - 2017-09-21
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Chernetski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26373 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a discretionary or a de novo standard. No. 2021AP1014-CR 5 of custody does not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643508 - 2023-04-11
a discretionary or a de novo standard. No. 2021AP1014-CR 5 of custody does not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643508 - 2023-04-11