Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14121 - 14130 of 59342 for quit claim deed.
Search results 14121 - 14130 of 59342 for quit claim deed.
Juneau County v. Sauk County
is barred, either by § 51.40(2)(a), Stats., or the doctrine of claim preclusion, from relitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12469 - 2005-03-31
is barred, either by § 51.40(2)(a), Stats., or the doctrine of claim preclusion, from relitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12469 - 2005-03-31
State v. George L. Wilson
“in concert” with those individuals from engaging in particular activities at medical clinics. Wilson claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7998 - 2005-03-31
“in concert” with those individuals from engaging in particular activities at medical clinics. Wilson claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7998 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Maureen B. Fitzgerald
Casualty. Ohio Casualty assigned claim numbers to both accidents. The only payment made by Ohio Casualty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25393 - 2006-06-01
Casualty. Ohio Casualty assigned claim numbers to both accidents. The only payment made by Ohio Casualty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25393 - 2006-06-01
[PDF]
State v. Andrew J. Biller
stop such vehicle at the No. 95-0704-CR -2- following claims of trial-court error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8759 - 2017-09-19
stop such vehicle at the No. 95-0704-CR -2- following claims of trial-court error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8759 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Joseph Ermenc v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
for breach of contract and bad faith after American Family denied a claim for $31,694.76 in medical bills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13665 - 2017-09-21
for breach of contract and bad faith after American Family denied a claim for $31,694.76 in medical bills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13665 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming he was denied the effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94948 - 2014-09-15
filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming he was denied the effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94948 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there is no arguable merit to a claim that Sanders’s pleas were unknowingly, involuntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158908 - 2017-09-21
there is no arguable merit to a claim that Sanders’s pleas were unknowingly, involuntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158908 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andrew J. Biller
] Biller asserts the following claims of trial-court error, which we have re-ordered for ease of analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8759 - 2005-03-31
] Biller asserts the following claims of trial-court error, which we have re-ordered for ease of analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8759 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul M. Nigl
, and that the sentence is the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6220 - 2017-09-19
, and that the sentence is the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6220 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James Evans
to a crime. Evans claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it: (1) denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15200 - 2017-09-21
to a crime. Evans claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it: (1) denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15200 - 2017-09-21