Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14121 - 14130 of 83855 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 14121 - 14130 of 83855 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Robert John Kotz
become disorderly and refused to leave the bar. The police arrested Kotz at the bar and after searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31
become disorderly and refused to leave the bar. The police arrested Kotz at the bar and after searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Wisconsin v. Daniel G. Latimer (L. C. Case No. 2020CF946) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
of Wisconsin v. Daniel G. Latimer (L. C. Case No. 2020CF946) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
constitutions protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. CONST. amend. IV; WIS. CONST. art. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61616 - 2014-09-15
constitutions protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. CONST. amend. IV; WIS. CONST. art. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61616 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
of their claims. We reject their arguments and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 The underlying case involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4257 - 2017-09-19
of their claims. We reject their arguments and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 The underlying case involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4257 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Wisconsin v. Daniel G. Latimer (L. C. Case No. 2020CF946) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
of Wisconsin v. Daniel G. Latimer (L. C. Case No. 2020CF946) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
[PDF]
Harrison M. Marcum v. Donald Gudmanson
, but concluded that the defendants “accurately state the facts and applicable law.” It appears the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11777 - 2017-09-20
, but concluded that the defendants “accurately state the facts and applicable law.” It appears the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11777 - 2017-09-20
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
and affirm the order. Background ¶2 The underlying case involved the Mommsens’ challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4257 - 2005-03-31
and affirm the order. Background ¶2 The underlying case involved the Mommsens’ challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 21
2016 WI App 21 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2014AP2928
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161670 - 2017-09-21
2016 WI App 21 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2014AP2928
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161670 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant was executed at Cardoza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant was executed at Cardoza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
of discretion on both evidentiary rulings and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36460 - 2014-09-15
of discretion on both evidentiary rulings and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36460 - 2014-09-15