Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14131 - 14140 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14131 - 14140 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nikola P. Kostich
, 974, 498 N.W.2d 380 (1993). The referee's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18713 - 2017-09-21
, 974, 498 N.W.2d 380 (1993). The referee's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18713 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
(citation and brackets omitted). We review such questions de novo. See State v. Green, 2002 WI 68, ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143202 - 2015-06-22
(citation and brackets omitted). We review such questions de novo. See State v. Green, 2002 WI 68, ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143202 - 2015-06-22
Vadim Katznelson v. Stuart Hoffman
an issue of law that we decide de novo. Northridge Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co., 162 Wis.2d 918, 923-24, 471
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9623 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law that we decide de novo. Northridge Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co., 162 Wis.2d 918, 923-24, 471
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9623 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joshua Jenkins
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
Christine Magnuson Stanfield v. Paul E. Magnuson
This appeal presents an issue of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7373 - 2005-03-31
This appeal presents an issue of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7373 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
does not contravene public policy, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. Ross v. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79943 - 2012-03-27
does not contravene public policy, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. Ross v. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79943 - 2012-03-27
Town of Waukesha v. City of Waukesha
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2458 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2458 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Although our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214995 - 2018-07-03
Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Although our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214995 - 2018-07-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W.2d 668
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W.2d 668
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
State v. Deann K. Baer
, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3617 - 2005-03-31
, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3617 - 2005-03-31