Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14141 - 14150 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14141 - 14150 of 30191 for de.
County of Walworth v. Glen E. Kelly
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Lentz’s accounts of Cooper’s consent were de minimis. The court found that the two officers described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60990 - 2011-03-14
and Lentz’s accounts of Cooper’s consent were de minimis. The court found that the two officers described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60990 - 2011-03-14
Michael D. Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
that we review de novo. Jacobs v. Karls, 178 Wis.2d 268, 273, 504 N.W.2d 353, 355 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Jacobs v. Karls, 178 Wis.2d 268, 273, 504 N.W.2d 353, 355 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
[PDF]
Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
State v. City of Rhinelander
the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5611 - 2005-03-31
the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5611 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
Dana J. Mignognia v. Salvatore Mignognia
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
State v. Miyosha K. White
of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31