Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14151 - 14160 of 73781 for we.
Search results 14151 - 14160 of 73781 for we.
[PDF]
NOTICE
argue that the Board of Review erred when it accepted the assessor’s valuation of their property. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44719 - 2014-09-15
argue that the Board of Review erred when it accepted the assessor’s valuation of their property. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44719 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by quit claim deed to Villalobos. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453411 - 2021-11-17
by quit claim deed to Villalobos. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453411 - 2021-11-17
[PDF]
State v. David Karich
from two judgments of conviction. The issues relate to Karich’s efforts to withdraw his plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10870 - 2017-09-20
from two judgments of conviction. The issues relate to Karich’s efforts to withdraw his plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10870 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael Vines
not meet its burden of proof with regard to his prior convictions. Because we conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9906 - 2005-03-31
not meet its burden of proof with regard to his prior convictions. Because we conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9906 - 2005-03-31
Andre Moore v. James P. Murphy
denying reconsideration. Because none of Moore's appellate arguments are persuasive, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10047 - 2005-03-31
denying reconsideration. Because none of Moore's appellate arguments are persuasive, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10047 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213860 - 2018-06-06
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213860 - 2018-06-06
Arline A. Smith v. City of Oconto
as a matter of law, we affirm the summary judgment of dismissal. The record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9815 - 2005-03-31
as a matter of law, we affirm the summary judgment of dismissal. The record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9815 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this matter is appropriate for summary disposition. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102508 - 2013-09-26
and record, we conclude at conference that this matter is appropriate for summary disposition. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102508 - 2013-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we 1 To the extent that Collins also seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069253 - 2026-01-29
, we 1 To the extent that Collins also seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069253 - 2026-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
be too high. Because we conclude that the assessor’s decision to reduce the assessment in 2006 was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45164 - 2009-12-29
be too high. Because we conclude that the assessor’s decision to reduce the assessment in 2006 was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45164 - 2009-12-29