Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14161 - 14170 of 30137 for consulta de causas.

Debra J. Wall v. Michael K. Wall
which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a seizure has occurred is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28648 - 2007-04-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The proper measure of damages applicable to a specific claim presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240597 - 2019-05-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. We review the language of a statute de novo. Clean Wis., Inc. v. DNR, 2021 WI 72, ¶10, 398 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840099 - 2024-08-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. “The application of a statute to the facts of the case is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waller v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26

COURT OF APPEALS
statutes to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88073 - 2012-10-10

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05

State v. Larry A. Coon
a probable cause determination de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5103 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. Renz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37033 - 2009-07-01

State v. Paul M. Nigl
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Nigl claims that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6220 - 2005-03-31