Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14161 - 14170 of 34733 for in n.

State v. Warren A. Moffett
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. See State v. Schumacher, 144 Wis. 2d 388, 408–409 n.14, 424 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4321 - 2005-03-31

Glenn F. Plautz By Charlotte Pagel v. Time Insurance Company
. This case was here once before. Estate of Plautz v. Time Ins. Co., 189 Wis.2d 136, 525 N.W.2d 342 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10001 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
’ in a statute is generally construed as permissive,” see Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Markel Ins. Co., 2011 WI App 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71614 - 2011-10-03

[PDF] NOTICE
a guilty plea. Id. at 485. We also explained that “[a]n understanding of potential punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52100 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
Clerk of Supreme Court REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 N
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67354 - 2011-07-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a judgment that disposes of the matter in litigation.” See Admiral Ins., 339 Wis. 2d 291, ¶33 & n.13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306146 - 2020-11-19

[PDF] Ronald Collison v. City of Milwaukee Board of Review
before the board and its decision. See Klinger v. Oneida County, 149 Wis. 2d 838, 845 n.6, 440 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5441 - 2017-09-19

General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Sherry L. Anderson
Ins. Co. v. Skrobis Painting & Decor., Inc., 182 Wis.2d 445, 450, 513 N.W.2d 695, 697 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10874 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Diversified Investments Corporation v. Regent Insurance Company
on Advance Watch Co., Ltd. v. Kemper Nat’l Ins. Co., 99 F.3d 795 (6th Cir. 1996), concluded that Regent did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14424 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mollie Place v. City of Milwaukee
that the mistrial/waiver rule seemed inconsistent with Wisconsin’s rules of evidence. Id., 168 Wis. 2d at 543 n.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7177 - 2017-09-20