Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14181 - 14190 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14181 - 14190 of 30191 for de.
Michael D. Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
that we review de novo. Jacobs v. Karls, 178 Wis.2d 268, 273, 504 N.W.2d 353, 355 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Jacobs v. Karls, 178 Wis.2d 268, 273, 504 N.W.2d 353, 355 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
[PDF]
Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
State v. City of Rhinelander
the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5611 - 2005-03-31
the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5611 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Gage v. John Hagen
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31
Dana J. Mignognia v. Salvatore Mignognia
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
State v. Miyosha K. White
of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 149
to invalidate the same document. David appeals. Discussion ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28862 - 2007-06-26
to invalidate the same document. David appeals. Discussion ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28862 - 2007-06-26