Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14181 - 14190 of 17552 for ex.

2008 WI APP 38
to the policy choices of the legislature. See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court, 2004 WI 58, ¶44, 271 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31825 - 2008-03-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
courts conduct a plain meaning analysis that begins with the statutory language. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515012 - 2022-04-28

WI App 77 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1585 Complete Title of...
is positive, full, and complete[, see State ex rel. Harvey v. Plankinton Arcade Co., 182 Wis. 23, 25, 195 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114813 - 2014-07-29

2007 WI APP 115
effect to the laws enacted by the legislature.’” Warehouse II, 291 Wis. 2d 80, ¶14 (citing State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28269 - 2007-04-26

[PDF] S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Town of Caledonia
. Love, Voss & Murray v. DOR, 195 Wis.2d 189, 196, 536 N.W.2d 126, 129 (Ct. App. 1995). In State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9751 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
or specially defined words are given their technical or special definitions. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28603 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeffrey Brunet
to Wisconsin's electronic surveillance law.[1] See State ex rel. Arnold v. County Court, 51 Wis.2d 434, 442, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10518 - 2005-03-31

Duane Kuester v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
ex rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Bd., 2002 WI App 64, ¶8, 252 Wis. 2d 628, 643 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6034 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 62
so that it may be given its full, proper, and intended effect.” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595327 - 2023-01-12

CA Blank Order
by which appointed counsel discharges the duty of representation. See State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128510 - 2014-11-18