Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14181 - 14190 of 58819 for o j.
Search results 14181 - 14190 of 58819 for o j.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Elworth was mentally ill. For example, Elworth cites “[o]ne study [that] showed that in a 10-week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546527 - 2022-07-27
that Elworth was mentally ill. For example, Elworth cites “[o]ne study [that] showed that in a 10-week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546527 - 2022-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] left until the case was over with.” King said he responded: “[N]o, you can put your money back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
] left until the case was over with.” King said he responded: “[N]o, you can put your money back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bradley K. Block
: [T]o vest this court with power of discretionary reversal to enable a defendant to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26502 - 2017-09-21
: [T]o vest this court with power of discretionary reversal to enable a defendant to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the outcome of the plea process.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). “[T]o satisfy the ‘prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345626 - 2021-03-16
the outcome of the plea process.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). “[T]o satisfy the ‘prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345626 - 2021-03-16
Appeal No
-90 (“[O]nly the supreme court, the highest court in the state, has the power to overrule, modify
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58795 - 2011-01-10
-90 (“[O]nly the supreme court, the highest court in the state, has the power to overrule, modify
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58795 - 2011-01-10
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5558 - 2005-03-31
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5558 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5566 - 2005-03-31
to be involved … [on] files where I have been court appointed … [s]o since I would have to be here anyway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5566 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradley K. Block
was not intended: [T]o vest this court with power of discretionary reversal to enable a defendant to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26502 - 2006-09-18
was not intended: [T]o vest this court with power of discretionary reversal to enable a defendant to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26502 - 2006-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). “[T]o satisfy the ‘prejudice’ requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319989 - 2021-01-05
process.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). “[T]o satisfy the ‘prejudice’ requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319989 - 2021-01-05
COURT OF APPEALS
and her father, if he exposed himself to her. … [o]r tried some things.” In follow-up questions on re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54125 - 2010-09-07
and her father, if he exposed himself to her. … [o]r tried some things.” In follow-up questions on re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54125 - 2010-09-07