Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14181 - 14190 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 14181 - 14190 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Donald R. Goldsworthy
convicting him of possessing marijuana with intent to deliver it. The dispositive issue is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11211 - 2005-03-31
convicting him of possessing marijuana with intent to deliver it. The dispositive issue is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11211 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a bench trial. 1 Tiffany argues that she was denied her constitutional right to a jury trial when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210039 - 2018-03-19
a bench trial. 1 Tiffany argues that she was denied her constitutional right to a jury trial when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210039 - 2018-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial. He argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102506 - 2013-09-30
for a new trial. He argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102506 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Goldsworthy
of possessing marijuana with intent to deliver it. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11211 - 2017-09-19
of possessing marijuana with intent to deliver it. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11211 - 2017-09-19
Duane Flesch v. Charles Wranosky
requests that this court find the appeal frivolous. We conclude that the trial court properly granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12146 - 2005-03-31
requests that this court find the appeal frivolous. We conclude that the trial court properly granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12146 - 2005-03-31
Village of Shorewood Hills v. Kenneth R. McGrew
that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a twelve-person jury trial. The trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3450 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a twelve-person jury trial. The trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3450 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102506 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102506 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
to be sentenced to the Division of Intensive Sanctions (DIS) and that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10864 - 2005-03-31
to be sentenced to the Division of Intensive Sanctions (DIS) and that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10864 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Minniecheske
in this court, we ordered the trial court to entertain an additional motion under § 974.06, STATS. This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9470 - 2017-09-19
in this court, we ordered the trial court to entertain an additional motion under § 974.06, STATS. This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9470 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven M. Sosinski
. Sosinski appeals pro se from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Sosinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8340 - 2005-03-31
. Sosinski appeals pro se from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Sosinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8340 - 2005-03-31