Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14191 - 14200 of 29970 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Chad D. Everts
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently is a question of constitutional fact that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Ashland v. John J. Jaakkola
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 No. 95-1359 -4- N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9065 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
a hearsay exception, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stevens, 171 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56785 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Sol Coleman, Jr. v. Michael Sullivan
a question of law that we decide de novo. See Spence v. Cooke, 222 Wis.2d 530, 536, 587 N.W.2d 904, 906
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14472 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
available claims earlier is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218915 - 2018-09-19

State v. Mark J. Modory
Cagle v. City of Gadsden, 495 So. 2d 1144 (Ala. 1986); State v. De Coster, 162 A.2d 704 (Conn. 1960
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10304 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Barney A. Guarnero v. Gerald A. Berge
been properly exhausted is subject to de novo review. State ex rel. L’Minggio v. Gamble, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6544 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jerome W.
is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20227 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ray J. Campbell
cause is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15146 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randy A. Davis
to the effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5835 - 2005-03-31