Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14191 - 14200 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14191 - 14200 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rights de novo. Stewart, 291 Wis. 2d 480, ¶12. Limits placed on a defendant’s movement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258444 - 2020-04-22
rights de novo. Stewart, 291 Wis. 2d 480, ¶12. Limits placed on a defendant’s movement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258444 - 2020-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197490 - 2017-10-10
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197490 - 2017-10-10
[PDF]
State v. Margaret C.
a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Patricia A.P., 195 Wis.2d at 862, 537 N.W.2d at 49-50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14792 - 2017-09-21
a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Patricia A.P., 195 Wis.2d at 862, 537 N.W.2d at 49-50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14792 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that our review is de novo. We disagree. Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 54.68(4), the circuit court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63166 - 2014-09-15
that our review is de novo. We disagree. Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 54.68(4), the circuit court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63166 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30890 - 2014-09-15
, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30890 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ryan C. Rumlow
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal Rumlow again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3397 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal Rumlow again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3397 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Brandon J. Green
great deference to the magistrate’s decision, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15511 - 2017-09-21
great deference to the magistrate’s decision, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15511 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo “‘the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485725 - 2022-02-22
review de novo “‘the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485725 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18